Crosslink Capital

Crosslink Capital partners with founders that are market disrupters and category creators typically at the Seed-Series A stage.

12 reviews

Independent rating of Crosslink Capital VC fund

Overall rating:
12 reviews
Team quality
Not reviewed
Professionalism
None
Personal qualities
None
Integrity
None
Respect and decency
None
Experience
None
Relevant expertise
None
Investment process
Not reviewed
Approachability
None
Clarity of the process
None
Speed of the process
None
Responsiveness
None
Ease of the process
None
Due diligence
None
Value add
Not reviewed
Supportiveness
None
Value add beyond financing
None
Board activity
None
Terms
None
Founder friendly
None
Help with follow-up rounds
None

About Crosslink Capital VC fund

Founded:
1989
Number of funds:
6
Number of investments:
409
Number of exits:
93
Headquarters:
Organization type:
Venture Capital

Portfolio - latest investments by Crosslink Capital VC fund

Founders' reviews of Crosslink Capital VC fund

Not reviewed
Team quality
Not reviewed
Investment process
Not reviewed
Value add
Not reviewed
Older than a year by non-portfolio founder
Fishing
Was contact by one of their junior people about our stealth company.
Not reviewed
Team quality
Not reviewed
Investment process
Not reviewed
Value add
Not reviewed
Older than a year by non-portfolio founder
Unlock more reviews by creating a free account
Good Pitch
We pitched Stephen at Crosslink and although we were not the right fit for us at the time, the feedback was open, honest, and helpful.
Not reviewed
Team quality
Not reviewed
Investment process
Not reviewed
Value add
Not reviewed
Older than a year by non-portfolio founder
Unlock more reviews by creating a free account
Great Experience with the Alpha Seed Program
Pitched these guys specifically as a candidate for their early stage program. Not sure if they do things the same way with regular VC level investments but dealing with them on the seed level was an absolute pleasure. Most efficient investors I've ever talked to.
Not reviewed
Team quality
Not reviewed
Investment process
Not reviewed
Value add
Not reviewed
Older than a year by non-portfolio founder
Unlock more reviews by creating a free account
Experienced
Though we did not receive funding from them, feedback from the partner I have met was very insightful.
Not reviewed
Team quality
Not reviewed
Investment process
Not reviewed
Value add
Not reviewed
Older than a year by non-portfolio founder
Unlock more reviews by creating a free account
Good Pitch, Tough Due Diligence, Good Terms, Fast to Close
I enjoyed pitching Bruce MacNaughton, Jim Feuille and the Crosslink team at the end of 2008. They understood our business and where it could go. They did a very deep dive on the due diligence. In fact, this turned out to be quite useful for our company and business strategy, as they drove to us develop some more detailed metrics about how our customers buy and scale up their deployments.
Not reviewed
Team quality
Not reviewed
Investment process
Not reviewed
Value add
Not reviewed
Older than a year by non-portfolio founder
Unlock more reviews by creating a free account
Not Terribly Impressed
I'd heard great things about Peter before pitching him, and went in expecting some good engagement and insight. Maybe I met him on a bad day. He was somewhat impatient--fair enough, time is precious--but also not as up to speed on our market as I would have expected given his background, and his questions seemed far more targeted for a Series B round than early stage. I know he's the early stage guy, but it made me wonder how much rope he really has.
Not reviewed
Team quality
Not reviewed
Investment process
Not reviewed
Value add
Not reviewed
Older than a year by non-portfolio founder
Unlock more reviews by creating a free account
Still Figuring It Out
I pitched Peter and found his comments to be insightful and valuable. He definitely lives up to his reputation as a good investor to work with, although can be extremely analytical at times, so be prepared.
Not reviewed
Team quality
Not reviewed
Investment process
Not reviewed
Value add
Not reviewed
Older than a year by non-portfolio founder
Unlock more reviews by creating a free account
Bruce Mac Naughton is a Reasonable VC: Though Wait Until Series B or Later
Our experience with Bruce was over all positive -- he understand the IT markets and buying process. The other guys we met with Gary Hromadko and Steven Perkins are very much MBA / financial types that ask a lot of theoretical questions about the market. To be fair, we pitched them for Series A -- and they are more Series B - public investors -- perhaps the best fit for early companies. As you get closer to public markets -- this team has potential to add value.
Not reviewed
Team quality
Not reviewed
Investment process
Not reviewed
Value add
Not reviewed
Older than a year by non-portfolio founder
Unlock more reviews by creating a free account
Send Junior Fishing?
A junior person approached me under the guise of having us pitch them for Series A. As the conversation progressed a bit, it became clear that the real objective was to gather intel. Turns out they had a couple of portfolio companies in the same space that were struggling. Not surprisingly, there was zero follow up.
Not reviewed
Team quality
Not reviewed
Investment process
Not reviewed
Value add
Not reviewed
Older than a year by non-portfolio founder
Unlock more reviews by creating a free account
Jim Feuille and Mike Stark Know Their Stuff
I recently pitched to Jim Feuille and Mike Stark for my startup in the consumer Internet space. They both are straight shooters that understand the sector. Jim has made investments in consumer companies such as Omniture, Pandora and Ancestry.com. There was a comment on here that said that Jim Feuille could be brutal. I agree that he had very focused questions, but I didn't think they were brutal at all. His questions actually showed that he understood the sector and got me thinking about things we could implement. As any entrepreneur should be, just be prepared when you pitch the firm. Overall, very positive experience. We are still waiting to hear back on the amount they are looking to invest in our seed round.
Not reviewed
Team quality
Not reviewed
Investment process
Not reviewed
Value add
Not reviewed
Older than a year by non-portfolio founder
Unlock more reviews by creating a free account
Great to Have on Your Board
They were very straightforward to deal with throughout the entire funding process. When we first pitched to them, they had done their homework on our space and asked some of the most relevant questions we were asked by any of the VC firms that we met with. As an early stage company, it was important to me to work with investors who not only looked at the numbers, but also really understood the vision. Crosslink really understood our vision, and even provided helpful suggestions during our first pitch meeting. In particular, Peter Rip is smart, thoughtful, experienced, and fair. If you're looking for funding, make sure to give Peter a call.
Not reviewed
Team quality
Not reviewed
Investment process
Not reviewed
Value add
Not reviewed
Older than a year by non-portfolio founder
Unlock more reviews by creating a free account
Blended Approach
Unusual blend of public, late stage, and (more recently) early stage private investing. This makes presentations a bit of a challenge, as the perspectives of these groups can be very different. The core people are investment bankers from Robertson Stephens (acquired by BofA in the late 90's).
Similar funds